Child support payments can be one of the impacts felt the longest following a separation or divorce, especially if there are young children involved. Parents will have to communicate for years about their finances and may expect to work through changes in support as their circumstances change over time. Having a child with a disability can add further complexity to matters of child support because some children with disabilities may require support from their parents long after they turn 18-years-old. These were the facts behind a case heard recently by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

The circumstances of the child

The child was born with serious cognitive and physiological disabilities, including severe autism, cerebral palsy, developmental delay, and epilepsy. The court explained that the child requires the constant presence of a caregiver.

The parents were married in 1987 and separated in 2006. By the time of the hearing they were both 64-years-old, and the child was 25-years-old. For many years the child lived with the mother, who acted as his primary care giver. However, as the child grew, the mother was no longer able to properly care for him, resulting in the child moving in with the father. After two years looking after the child, the father applied to the court with a motion to receive an increase in child support from the mother.

Has there been a material change in circumstances?

The court first looked at whether there had been a material change in circumstances, something needed in order to vary child support. The court did not take long to conclude that there had been a material change, noting that when the original order was established, the child was living with the mother, and was now living with the father.

Is the son still a “child of the marriage”?

The next issue the court addressed was whether the son is still a “child of the marriage.” This is part of the test for determining whether adult children are entitled to child support.  The court is able to exercise considerable discretion when addressing this. The court established that the child was still a child of the marriage, writing he “is now 25 years old. He is permanently disabled and is completely dependent on his parents to take care of his physical, emotional, health and financial needs. I am satisfied that (the child) is unable to withdraw from parental charge due to his disability and is entitled to support.”

Establishing the quantum for ongoing child support

The court determined the Child Support Guidelines are not appropriate to use in this situation. Even the mother submitted that the amount called for in the Guidelines, which are based on income, were below what is actually needed. She submitted that $1,167.52 per month was appropriate, with the Guidelines only landing on $871.

The court agreed with the gather that there should be a sharing of responsibility between all parties involved as well as the state (through government funding). The court looked at how much the child receives in support from the government and turned to the parents’ income in order to address the shortfall. The mother’s income was $95,000 per year, while the father’s was $55,000. The court ordered the mother to pay 63% of the difference, with the father covering the remaining 37%.

Contact Arbesman Hamilton LLP early in your separation to understand your rights and obtain the best possible child support arrangement for your children. Our firm and its forerunners have been advising clients on child support and other family law matters since 1953. We remain committed to upholding the principles established by our distinguished predecessors: combining big firm results with a small firm relationship, and an overall commitment to always put our clients’ best interests first. Contact us online or at 416-481-5604 to book a consultation.

COVID-19 Is No Excuse On Failure To Act In Estate Dispute

The impact of COVID-19 has been felt by everyone, and in many areas of life, people and organizations have received leniency in some of the…
Read Post

International Abduction When The Hague Convention Does Not Apply

Despite how large the world can be (even with technology making it seem smaller every day ) countries still demonstrate ways to work together for…
Read Post

Father Disputes Ownership Of Property With Children

The division of family property can be a contentious issue, especially if one party believes they have not received a fair share of the property…
Read Post

Contact

NULaw
509 Davenport Road
Toronto, ON M4V 1B8

Tel: +1 416 481 5604 Fax: +1 416 481 5829

NULaw proudly services clients in Toronto and throughout Ontario